cume and groups WAS: SNDPTFORD V7R4 - SAVF vs IMAGE -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: cume and groups WAS: SNDPTFORD V7R4 - SAVF vs IMAGE
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 11:32:31 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Look at it this way, suppose there was a hiper which came out after the cume which said "in rare instances your disk drives will become unrecognizable after putting on the cume and you'll have to unload/reload using a new respin of the OS" don't you think you'd want to put that on at the same time as the cume?
BTW, the quoted text was not from any example or experience and was totally fictitious and to be used only for example purposes.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.