RPGLE and Threadsafe Issues -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RPGLE and Threadsafe Issues
From: Rich Loeber <rich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:16:05 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We are being told by IBM that RPGLE is problematic when attempting to create a *PGM object that is threadsafe. Unfortunately, we are not getting a good explanation and we are being told that we have to re-code our solution in C. For some reason, this doesn't sound kosher to us.

For a *PGM to be threadsafe, are there certain things that need to be avoided?

Rich Loeber - @richloeber
Kisco Information Systems
http://www.kisco.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: RPGLE and Threadsafe Issues , Jon Paris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.