Re: CHGTCPA TCPRCVBUF(262144) TCPSNDBUF(262144) -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: CHGTCPA TCPRCVBUF(262144) TCPSNDBUF(262144)
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 23:27:55 +0100
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Rob,

Am 11.02.2020 um 21:58 schrieb Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>:

Can anyone guess why I have it set to that size?

To indirectly follow-up Holger's message: Bigger Buffers usually help with gaining transfer speed of streaming data over high latency WAN links.

If you're just doing tn5250 in LAN, nearly every small setting is sufficient. If you do file transfers, like FTP or Sftp/Scp, you'll notice a performance gain. How big this is, is dependent on a multitude of factors, though.

:wq! PoC

PGP-Key: DDD3 4ABF 6413 38DE - https://www.pocnet.net/poc-key.asc

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.