RE: Disks are getting hammered ?SMPO0001? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Disks are getting hammered ?SMPO0001?
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:29:21 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Inherently I tend to agree that save while active on IFS is a sick joke. And I can understand the performance concerns that multiple people brought up.
There's a little part of me wondering why I used SWA in the first place. I need to confirm that there's not some obscure reason why I did that in the first place. Like IBM had me do it to resolve some other issue or some such thing.

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

RE: Disks are getting hammered ?SMPO0001? , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.