RE: Disks are getting hammered ?SMPO0001? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Disks are getting hammered ?SMPO0001?
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:29:21 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Inherently I tend to agree that save while active on IFS is a sick joke. And I can understand the performance concerns that multiple people brought up.
There's a little part of me wondering why I used SWA in the first place. I need to confirm that there's not some obscure reason why I did that in the first place. Like IBM had me do it to resolve some other issue or some such thing.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Disks are getting hammered ?SMPO0001? , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.