RE: Question on 'appropriateness' of using QSH commands to -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Question on 'appropriateness' of using QSH commands to
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 13:36:51 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

If you're working with qsys.lib your coworkers may be more comfortable with a stored procedure based off of something like object_statistics or syspartitionstat (for members).
I have a sample stored procedure which burns through all members without any locks and submits off a rgzpfm if the deleted row count is significant.
Sure not as simple as that qsh statement though.

Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.