Re: Converting large amount of data

[Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:30 PM Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> I shouldn't have stuck the word name in there; the IBM document doesn't
> use that word.  I think I did it because I don't use the same record
> name for two different database record formats.  I only use the record
> format from the physical when the logical has all the fields from the
> physical.  I know you don't have to do that, but that's the way I've
> always done it.

I've always considered that the "right" way, the record format name
shouldn't match unless the record formats do.

Charles