Re: Controlling values for Automatic STRCMTCTL

I'm not the one deciding. If it was up to me I'd rather "do it right". But the workload to do that is massive with little or no payback and I can understand the customer's reluctance to go that route.

When you migrate apps from one platform to another this kind of compromise is often essential. In this case it most certainly is. I doubt if we would have any disagreement if we were talking new apps - but we're not. We're trying to potentially introduce some service programs to avoid dynamic calls to existing I/O routines. The routing portion of the app (a package) is not changeable and is stuck in OPM. That kinda limits the options.


Jon

On Apr 16, 2021, at 2:08 PM, D*B <dieter.bender@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<jon>
The granularity that you discuss is just not needed in a short run batch process.
</jon>

... you are old enough to decide, what you wanna do. IMHO it's not related to the size of transactions, it's a decision restricting the future of the application

Have a nice day

Dieter --
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com