I'd be very surprised if your windows servers were limited to a dedicated
console...

Charles

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 9:50 AM Justin Taylor <jtaylor.0ab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think it's a very safe assumption the compliance people don't know IBMi,
and they operate in a Windows-centric world.

My (desparate) goal with this question is to severly limit admin access. I
can disable the profile, but that still allows LAN console access. Direct
cabling the PC to the console port was my best idea. I don't think
anything less would meet the mandate.

I got in to plead my case to the VP this morning. He's going to get with
legal and push back against this requirement in regards to IBMi.

Thanks
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.