Re: browser support of HTTP -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: browser support of HTTP
From: "James H. H. Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:01:27 -0700
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 6/1/21 12:01 PM, Calvin Buckley wrote:

This isn’t an HTTP vs. HTTPS thing, and more browser vendors moving
to block 10080 because of historical misuse.

Which of course begs the question of why one would even be using 10080 as an HTTP port, when it's got such a bad reputation.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: browser support of HTTP , Brad Stone
Re: browser support of HTTP , Patrik Schindler

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.