SQL View vs CTE -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: SQL View vs CTE
From: Greg Wilburn <gwilburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 21:24:58 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I have a complex SQL statement that I'm going to use as a data source for a browser application. In ACS Run SQL scripts it consistently takes about 22 seconds to run. The statement contains a CTE followed by a join to the CTE. The files involved have a large number of records.

So I'm wondering if someone can tell me whether creating an SQL View in place of the CTE would yield any performance increase (I haven't spent much time looking at the Visual Explain in ACS).
I'm thinking it wouldn't make much difference.

TIA
Greg
[Logo]<https://www.totalbizfulfillment.com/> Greg Wilburn
Director of IT
301.895.3792 ext. 1231
301.895.3895 direct
gwilburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gwilburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
1 Corporate Dr
Grantsville, MD 21536
www.totalbizfulfillment.com<http://www.totalbizfulfillment.com>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: SQL View vs CTE , Charles Wilt
RE: SQL View vs CTE , Greg Wilburn
Re: SQL View vs CTE , Timothy P Clark

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.