On 12/13/21 6:30 AM, Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis wrote:
. . .
I think part of the confusion here is the word Apache. Apache in this 
case refers NOT to the Apache Web Server (a VERY commonly used server on 
IBM i) but instead to the Apache software foundation.. . .
Quite. And unfortunately, people have a habit of referring to *anything* 
from Apache as simply Apache. Whether it's the Apache Web Server (more 
properly the Apache httpd Web Server, which is not Java-based, and 
therefore not affected), or Apache Tomcat (which can also function as a 
web server; it's Java based, but no even remotely current version uses 
Log4j), or some other product. In fact, the only Apache product I'm 
aware of that I've *never* heard referred to as simply "Apache" would be 
SVN.
Sort of the same way, nearly four decades ago, people almost immediately 
began referring to "Lotus 1-2-3" as simply "Lotus."
Let's all endeavour to be more specific about Apache products.
--
JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
	
 
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.