Another question: Do you have this same problem on another system with the same JVM? Or is this particular program unique to this customer only?
Yet another point to ponder. If you rmvptf and it resolves it you will have to do one of two things.
1 - Get IBM to issue a fixing ptf
2 - Code around it
Because it's unfair, unreasonable, etc to assume that the customer(s) will never apply a ptf again.
Perhaps this new JVM deprecates some old function you are using. It's something you may have to address.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.