RE: qsh stdout difference per IBM i -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: qsh stdout difference per IBM i
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:35:07 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I'd try it but I'm trying to avoid VPNing into work as I don't want to show as available on our IM. 😊
I wonder if one of the directories might be a symbolic link?
I'm also concerned why the one shows the full path name. Check both your *SYS and *JOB environment variables.
Are they on the same version of the OS? Simple outputs like this are almost always covered with a generic statement in the MTU as a way of encouraging you to use APIs or SQL services instead of relying upon positioning in spool files, etc.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: qsh stdout difference per IBM i , Jack Woehr

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.