RE: IBM requiring 2FA -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: IBM requiring 2FA
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:55:10 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I probably can only squeak a little about 2FA. Apparently we're rolling it out here for O365. Luckily we can restrict it to only when using O365 outside of our network. Then we're under the assumption that these users have smart phones. Which you may take for granted but our consultant network admin is seriously into paranoia and only took a company supplied phone for 2FA providing he can keep it in a secure box (?lead lined?) when not needing 2FA.
Starting to envy the local Amish population...

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: IBM requiring 2FA , Jack Woehr

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.