Re: CICS/400 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: CICS/400
From: Jack Woehr <jwoehr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:23:47 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 7:47 PM Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Mainframe folks did not want to learn IBM i ( or OS/400 as it was then
called, or CPF for us really old ones) and the IBM i guys could not learn
CICS.

Thanks for the insight, Jim. The siloing between z and i is the bane of our
practice, as noted in my recent blog
<https://www.seidengroup.com/2023/08/02/from-i-to-z/>.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.