Chores are piling up but a google search (platform independent) shows a
line like: "...4 drives will give you more throughput than 3 as you’ll be
striping reads across 3 drives rather than 2, so theoretically it should be
as good as 50% faster."

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:36 AM Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello Rob,

Am 01.03.2024 um 16:33 schrieb Rob Berendt <robertowenberendt@xxxxxxxxx>:

I think I found such a thread about that...
https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201308/msg00644.html

You stated there, it's a performance killer, on IBM i and elsewhere. I
have not heard about this before. May I kindly ask you to give some more
details?

:wq! PoC

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.