Re: Will IBM ever expand system object names?

I agree with Jon about IBM not spending a dime on this idea. First off it
would/might break quite a long list of software both commercial and private.
Next, SQL already allows for long names in the database, that's been there
for some time. Really the only thing you would be adding to the list are
program names and several other objects that quite frankly do not really
need long names.

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects


On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:07 AM Diego E. KESSELMAN <
diegokesselman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You should create an IBM Idea

On 29/05/24 07:18, Javier Sanchez wrote:

With SQL objects this is already possible, and sometime in the future,
maybe we will be able to do everything using only SQL, which would be
fantastic.

What about in the meantime we could have expanded the current 10-char
system object name length to something longer?

This is one item on my wish list, and I could also consider including the
underscore character as a valid starting one for such names.

JS

--
Saludos/Regards

Diego E. KESSELMAN

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.