Re: Will IBM ever expand system object names?

[VERNON HAMBERG Owner <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Be sure to search Ideas first - seems I've seen this already when reviewing in a CAAC meeting.


As Jon said, there are reasons not to, it would be a tremendous cost.


Cheers
Vern


On Wed, 29 May, 2024 at 10:09 AM, Diego E. KESSELMAN <diegokesselman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 

To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You should create an IBM Idea

On 29/05/24 07:18, Javier Sanchez wrote:
> With SQL objects this is already possible, and sometime in the future,
> maybe we will be able to do everything using only SQL, which would be
> fantastic.
>
> What about in the meantime we could have expanded the current 10-char
> system object name length to something longer?
>
> This is one item on my wish list, and I could also consider including the
> underscore character as a valid starting one for such names.
>
> JS