Re: Will IBM ever expand system object names? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Will IBM ever expand system object names?
From: VERNON HAMBERG Owner <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:57:16 -0700
Auth-sender: vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Woohoo! Javier gets 1 vote for his Idea!

I'd say to Javier, nothing lost in submitting the Idea - those of us here are not the end of the story - we have our experience and opinions - IBM is the final arbiter, so let them think on it. It won't help to keep tossing it around here.

Cheers
Vern

On Wed, 29 May, 2024 at 12:42 PM, Brad Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To: midrange systems technical discussion

I like it. :)

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:35 PM Javier Sanchez <
javiersanchezbarquero@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:javiersanchezbarquero@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

What if this existed?

CRTBNDRPG PGM(MYPGM) LONGNAME(MYLONGPROGRAMNAME) .....

and at some point you just like:

CALL LONGPGMN(MYLONGPROGRAMNAME)

And this would work for new applications. Why not?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Will IBM ever expand system object names? , Javier Sanchez

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.