Re: Problem with iconv: what could I be doing wrong?

On 7/11/24 11:39 AM, Jon Paris wrote:

Well back in 2000 we didn't have qualified DS and a whole bunch of
other stuff.

Some of the changes I made could have been done back then but
qualified DS are so nice for this kind of thing.

Hmm. I thought about making it qualified . . . and I was a little puzzled when I didn't see a "QUALIFIED" keyword.

Then, at wits' end, I looked up LIKEDS in the manual. And I noticed "When LIKEDS is coded on a data structure subfield definition, the subfield data structure is automatically defined as QUALIFIED."

With apologies to Mel Brooks and the late Gene Wilder, "Of course. That would simplify everything."

(And, with apologies to Steve Martin, the Langstrom 7-inch gangly wrench CAN be used with the Findlay sprocket.)

--
JHHL