Re: is this the correct understanding for commitment control running in ILE? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: is this the correct understanding for commitment control running in ILE?
From: Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 07:42:05 -0400
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2024-07-27 3:20 a.m., Dsternb wrote:

<Barbara>
If you choose QILE, you are using the same activation group as all those
programs written by people who didn't bother to consider what activation
group to use. Those programs might be adding overrides or commitment control
that you don't want to be part of.
</Barbara>

and what about starting commit at joblevel? Same with overrides!

D*B

Right. If commitment control or overrides are started at job level, everything is affected.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.