Re: Memory and CPU Considerations for IBM i LPARs -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Memory and CPU Considerations for IBM i LPARs
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:40:57 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Jim,

Am 22.08.2024 um 16:42 schrieb Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

If you have not moved the hosted environment into its own shared pool(s) then all that work and the work the host does in *BASE is mixed and interesting things can show up and hamper operations. I said "interesting" because hosting certainly can stay in *BASE successfully, but it's not in my view a best practice, unless that's the only thing IBM i does is host the other environments.

Is your allegation based on current experience, or based on old and probably outdated best practices when memory was scarce?

No offense intended, just asking clearly.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Memory and CPU Considerations for IBM i LPARs , Jim Oberholtzer

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.