I'm going to be a contrarian here. I think that, other than a few unique situations, it's not good advice to have to qualify all your objects. The *LIBL is a wonderful feature that is unmatched on Unix and Windows platforms. The path environment variable is a poor substitute.

The alternative is to have a proper authority scheme on your objects. Carol Woodbury, Steve Pitcher and others have given many seminars and webinars on how to do that.

-mark

On 9/18/2024 11:44 AM, Mark Waterbury wrote:
Hi, Rob,

Short answer -- not all of the IBM objects of concern are in QSYS, QSYS2, QHLPSYS or QUSRSYS.


Mark

On Wednesday, September 18, 2024 at 10:34:50 AM EDT, Rob Berendt<robertowenberendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If it is primarily for IBM type library objects,
and you have system value QSYSLIBL set sanely,
how do they get something higher in the library list?

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.