Re: strategy to prove backups are good -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: strategy to prove backups are good
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:36:24 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello Nelson,

Am 22.04.2025 um 01:55 schrieb nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:

A good change management system will allow you to keep as many archived copies of the source code as you specify.

That's not my point. I provided a possible scenario that even cumulative saves aren't "no worries". I could as easily have used "create an AFP overlay" as example.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.