Re: SQL stored procedure takes longer to run in batch than interactively. -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SQL stored procedure takes longer to run in batch than interactively.
From: Bobby Adams <bobby_adams@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:33:06 -0400
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Yes. Ours is below. I do not know how or why the values were set, but if you have questions I will ask.

+++++ *MACHINE
1118 *BASE
    10   2          QBATCH      QSYS
    10 *SHRPOOL10
    10   2          QCMN        QSYS
     3   2          QPGMR       QSYS
    15 *SPOOL
2272 *INTERACT

On 5/15/2025 13:15, Glenn Gundermann wrote:

I'm confused. You have Max Active set to 10?

Our values look like this:

+++++ *MACHINE
2400 *BASE
5600 *INTERACT
15 *SPOOL

Yours truly,

Glenn Gundermann
Email: glenn.gundermann@xxxxxxxxx
Cell: (416) 317-3144

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: SQL stored procedure takes longer to run in batch than interactively. , Don Brown
Re: SQL stored procedure takes longer to run in batch than interactively. , Jim Oberholtzer
Re: SQL stored procedure takes longer to run in batch than interactively. , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.