IMHO the takeaway here is that the greenscreen interface, within its now-too-obvious limits, hewed tightly to certain usability factors mandated from top down.
IBM did studies in the early 1970's on the decline in operator productivity measured against response time, etc.
The problem of crappy web interfaces that supplant tight greenscreen code is not an intrinsic validation of greenscreen vs. web interface.
The problem is that some web programmers are more interested in web programming, web toolkits, and visual features unrelated to enterprise productivity than in delivering a comfortable workspace in a browser to people who work intensively in one application day after day.

________________________________
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Pete Helgren <pete@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2025 13:58
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Costco still on IBM i?

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I think this is an excellent example of how durable and "in the present"
the IBM i is. A "green screen" is not necessarily equivalent to "stuck
in the past". I use SSH/puTTy "black screen" aka "ugly terminal" every
day on the most bleeding edge platforms out there. Choose the best tool
for the best job....

Pete Helgren


Jack Woehr
Independent Consulting Programmer

303-847-8442

jack.woehr@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.procern.com

Stay Connected!

Upgrade your IT state of mind!

 NON-DISCLOSURE NOTICE: This communication including any and all attachments is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying further distribution or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy all copies of this communication immediately.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.