Yes, and DO NOT lock QSYSOPR ( or QSYSMSG for that matter) since really bad things could happen if the OS and other things cannot get to that queue.


Jim Oberholtzer
Agile Technology Architects

On Sep 11, 2025, at 6:22 AM, Rich Loeber <rich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Take a look at the STRWCH command in the OS.

Rich Loeber
Kisco Systems

Rich
________________________________
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Don Brown via MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 4:41:47 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Don Brown <dbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Qsysopr message queue locks

Hi,

I was using a rcvmsg on the qsysopr message queue with a wait(*max) to check for a specific message about a locked net server profile.

This message does not go to the qsysmsg queue.

While my monitor program was working fine it did put an exclusive lock on the message queue.

The application they use has a process that also need to check something on the qsysopr message queue and failed because my monitor was locking the queue.

I changed my program to use a specific wait value of 5 seconds and the put a delay job of 2 minutes if there were no messages received on the rcvmsg. When the delay job is in effect the lck on the message queue is released. However, the application provider is still complaining.

My question, is there any other way to monitor messages being added to the qsysopr message queue that does not put an *EXCL lock on the message queue ?

Thanks for any suggestions

Cheers

Don


Brisbane - Sydney - Melbourne


Don Brown

Senior Consultant




P: 1300 088 400




DISCLAIMER. Before opening any attachments, check them for viruses and defects. This email and its attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or copy this email or its attachments but notify sender and delete it. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.