Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands

Subject: Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc
From: Mark Waterbury <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 13:48:34 +0000 (UTC)
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Brad,

Perhaps it may have to do with the fact that the SNDSMTPEMM *CMD in QSYS is only a *PROXY command, merely pointing to the "real" SNDSMTPEMM command definition object in library QTCP.

Mark

On Saturday, September 13, 2025 at 09:21:31 AM EDT, Brad Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am messing around with this and for some reason the Allow Change flag for SNDSMTPEMM is set as 0, unable to change.

Any ideas why? SNDDST seems to be ok, but I have a feeling more are using SNDSMTPEMM as SNDDST is pretty old and outdated and uses folders instead of IFS files for attachments.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc , Brad Stone

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.

Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc