Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands

Subject: Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc
From: Mark Waterbury <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 13:48:34 +0000 (UTC)
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Brad,

Perhaps it may have to do with the fact that the SNDSMTPEMM *CMD in QSYS is only a *PROXY command, merely pointing to the "real" SNDSMTPEMM command definition object in library QTCP.

Mark

On Saturday, September 13, 2025 at 09:21:31 AM EDT, Brad Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am messing around with this and for some reason the Allow Change flag for SNDSMTPEMM is set as 0, unable to change.

Any ideas why? SNDDST seems to be ok, but I have a feeling more are using SNDSMTPEMM as SNDDST is pretty old and outdated and uses folders instead of IFS files for attachments.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc , Brad Stone

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.

Re: Changing processing program of IBM commands - Legality, etc