|
>Chris Rehm: >Which is exactly the point. The browser is an interface accessing remote >machines. When the browser was invented, it created a threat to the Windows >monopoly. But because Netscape couldn't bundle they could not stop Microsoft >from stealing this market from them. The browser WAS an interface accessing remote machines. As the technology evolved browsers became interfaces for more than just remote web/text/graphics content. It became clear that this would become the presentation for local or remote applications. I think that Microsoft understood that browsing was going to become the interface of choice and that it would be a good idea to migrate the Windows desktop to that format. The browser is becoming infrastructure, not an application. If all Microsoft did was pre-install IE with Windows I think that there would be legitimate grounds for an antitrust suit. What they really did was make it a part of the desktop and the OS, or establish that as a technical direction. >Thus allowing the monopoly power over >the OS market to be used to crush innovation. Once the browser threat is >under control, use the control of the browser market to further destroy >threats, like say, eliminating non-Microsoft technologies. Wait a few days to calm down, have a beer, and reread this one. Such drama. In this case I really think that Microsoft was establishing an intelligent technical direction, not explicitly trying to wipe out a competitive product. That it was bound to crush Netscape was just gravy. If OS/400 V6R1 introduces the ability to save spooled files to tape and track those save entries to an archive should Broderick Data Systems sue? If SEU in V5R3 comes with built in source/program/object cross referencing should Hawkeye crawl out from under their crushed innovation and call in a District Attorney? It's funny that as we whine on these forums over the projected demise of the AS/400, our favorite integrated system, we're all too willing to condemn Microsoft's integration attempts. It may take a decade or more, but if things go the way they have been I predict that Microsoft will cripple Oracle by integrating SQL Server with the operating system. Maybe we should start a suit against IBM. Those evil bastards have bundled their database software with OS/400 and won't provide Oracle, Microsoft, or Sybase with API documentation so they can write a competitive product. -Jim James P. Damato Manager - Technical Administration Dollar General Corporation <mailto:jdamato@dollargeneral.com>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.