There is a difference between getting fiend, and getting fined AND paying
for all the legal fees.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walden H. Leverich III" <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users'" <pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:19 AM
Subject: RE: [PcTech] Rockin' on without Microsoft


> >From: JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >they would have gotten the fees that were due,
>
> And fines and back interest?
>
> Or are you saying that if BSA came in and said, oh, you're non-compliant,
> you have five copies of xxx that you don't have a license for, each copy
> costs $100 please pay the software maker $500 everything would be ok?
>
> If the former, ok, if the latter, then every company should simply be
> _willing_ to pay for software. IF they ever get audited then they'll pay
> what they would have in the first place, if they're not audited then they
> don't have to pay for software at all.
>
> -Walden
>
> ------------
> Walden H Leverich III
> President
> Tech Software
> (516) 627-3800 x11
> (208) 692-3308 eFax
> WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.TechSoftInc.com
>
> Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
> (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 9:22 AM
> To: pctech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PcTech] Rockin' on without Microsoft
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <snip>
> Interesting article indeed. The thing that hit me most was:
>
> >... [BSA] conducted a raid and subsequent audit ... that turned up
> >a few dozen unlicensed copies of programs.
>
> And
>
> >"We won't do business with someone who treats us poorly."
>
> Now, when you are using unlicensed copies of software who is treating who
> unfairly?
>
> -Walden
> </snip>
>
> OK, Walden I can see you're point, however what you did not mention in the
> article was Ball's point that if the BSA had come in and asked for a
> voluntary audit, and worked with the company, instead of using the Gestapo
> jack boot up front, they would have gotten the fees that were due, and
most
> likely kept a customer.  Remember we are talking about 8 (eight) copies,
> not 1000s.  A little common sense would be nice with these fellas.    We
> had a company in Wisconsin that was treated the same way as Ball, and beat
> the audit 100%.  BSA did not have to pay back this company for the money
> they spent to defend themselves. (almost 20% of the gross profit for the
> year)   Why is that?
>
> Jim Oberholtzer
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing
list
> To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
> or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.
> _______________________________________________
> This is the PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users (PcTech) mailing
list
> To post a message email: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech
> or email: PcTech-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/pctech.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.