RE: RE: IP-Cop Firewall -- PCTECH

Subject: RE: [PCTECH] RE: IP-Cop Firewall
From: "Wills, Mike N. (TC)" <MNWills@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:48:28 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

But I bet that isn't the architecture as Intel, thus a lot more efficient.

Mike Wills


-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Lang 

Just as a comparison.  The Cisco Pix 515, which I use at my office, will
handle over 100,000+ simultaneous connections and 2000 3DES VPN connections
and it uses a 400MHz processor and 64 MB of RAM.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: RE: IP-Cop Firewall , Adam Lang

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.