Booth Martin wrote:

My own thought was that he'd better off installing OS/2 or Linux

I've been hung up on thoughts of OS/2 lately. I loved it when I had it and now have a couple spare PCs that could make decent systems for it, so I might load up a copy I have still.


But what I've been pondering is the thought of IBM getting active with it again. Maybe the time is becoming right to bring focus back to it. It is still for sale from IBM AFAIK. It was the last time I looked.

Not positioned quite like they did back then; in a somewhat different way.

OS/2 might make a superb environment for a solid JVM and various packages such as OpenOffice. Position it as an alternative host OS for open-source packages, a secure alternative for Internet applications.

I'm perfectly happy with OpenOffice at home. I use Netscape instead of IE. The more I think about it, I'm no longer sure why I'm using Win2K right now except it seemed to make sense at the time. Even today, I know more about how OS/2 'worked' than I do Win2K. But then, OS/2 made some sense to me.

Tom Liotta


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.