> -----Original Message-----
> From: pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / Tom Liotta
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 4:08 AM
>
> Dan Bale wrote:
>
> > Anyway, if that were the case, it would seem to make sense to drop OS/2.
> > New apps developed for OS/2 vs. Linux = no brainer.
>
> As long as the apps support decent, fundamental features, as OpenOffice
> has been closing in on, I less concerned by large numbers of apps.
>
> Now, if a couple OS/2 features could be implemented in Linux, I'd be
> perfectly happy with it.
>
> My #1 feature missed from OS/2 is the way 'program objects' on the
> desktop were implemented. Similar to creating a command object to prompt
> for program parms in OS/400. iSeries Access has programs such as
> lstsplf.exe that you can create shortcuts for on the Windows desktop and
> you can modify the shortcut properties to make it point to a specific
> system. But if you have two or more AS/400s, you have to create two or
> more shortcuts. An OS/2 program object could be configured to prompt you
> for "System?" and multiple prompts for multiple parms.
>
> Another feature that Windows apparently finally caught up with...
> shortcuts that don't get invalidated because the target object was moved
> to a different directory. OS/2 handled that correctly, linking the
> shortcut (shadow?) to the object identifier rather than a path. Not sure
> how Windows does it now.
>
> The good old days... sigh.
>
> Tom Liotta

OK, let me clarify...  It would make "economic" sense for IBM to drop OS/2.
The way I see it, IBM ceded OS/2 to Windows a long time ago, long before the
"official" announcment.  Of course, everyone knows OS/2 was a far superior
product.  And again, I wonder what OS/2 would be like today had IBM not
failed so miserably in marketing it. <sob>

I admit that I have not kept up with OS/2's status.  I assumed that there's
virtually no app development going on for it.  False assumption?

The good old days indeed.  I'm gonna go cry in my beer at lunch.

db


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.