Is Windows XP more secure than Windows 2000? -- PCTECH

Subject: [PCTECH] Is Windows XP more secure than Windows 2000?
From: "Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:44:00 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Under the assumption that both are fully patched, it seems obvious to me
that WinXP would be.

How about stability?

The reason I ask is that one of our users just got a new PC delivered with
Win2k installed.  When I asked why not XP, I was told that "they"
standardized on Win2k.  I do not know who "they" are.

TIA, db

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Is Windows XP more secure than Windows 2000? , Adam Lang

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.