Re: Free office ! IBM Lotus Symphony -- PCTECH

Subject: Re: Free office ! IBM Lotus Symphony
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:06:18 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Martin Rowe

Symphony is built on the OpenOffice.org 1.x code base, whereas
OpenOffice.org is now at (as of this week) 2.3. I'm assuming with
IBM's announcement of 35 developers to work on OOo that there will be
a relatively quick catch up process. OOo 2.3 is quite an improvement
on the old 1.x versions, and it seems to cope much better with MS
Office files (though doing better still would be welcome).

Martin, I still don't fully understand the relationship between Eclipse,
Open Office and Symphony. I want to get some more information about this
because it seems to me that IBM would have done much better to release
Symphony on the newest (or at least a newer) OOo codebase.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Free office ! IBM Lotus Symphony , Martin Rowe

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.