Having followed OLPC like Nathan, I think I'll nitpick and say that OLPC identified the new market, got several countries interested and *then* MS jumped in. At first they tried to come up with a version of Windows that would run on the XO laptop, but Intel got involved, so now they're apparently simply trying to come up with their own low-cost solution, but decided to make it low-capability also, probably because they can't get Windows to run on such a small PC.

I have a sneaking suspicion that they are not only tapping a new market, but they're also worried about a world where more people use Linux than Windows.

*Peter Dow* /
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050
pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> /

Walden H. Leverich wrote:
I don't know if there's any legal remedy to stop Microsoft from extending their monopoly.

As an MS shareholder, I've got to ask, what's the problem? They've
identified a new market, come up with a solution to use (some of) an
existing product to compete in that market, and are planning on
deploying it. This is simply good business.
What part of it do you feel should fall under anti-trust, or other,
"legal" rememdies?

-Walden


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.