Joe Pluta wrote:
As soon as you get into video, you'll blow through a terabyte.

Probably, but a) I'm not very interested in video at the moment, and b) I wouldn't put video on a NAS device anyways (except for archiving). Video editing wants a lot of bandwidth, so I would put that kind of thing on a local disk (or disk array).

Once you have such a machine, there's then nothing stopping you from
using that device as your NAS for other machines in your network. It's
a little more expensive route, but it kills two birds: you have a nice
NAS device and one seriously powerful multimedia workstation.

Well, I wouldn't make a workstation (of any kind) a primary file server ... there are a lot of systems that would be depending on the file server and the possibility of a workstation rebooting (either planned or unplanned) are higher than I would be comfortable with. Do you think the people who depend on the list archives would like it if the web content went away anytime I installed new software? <grin/>

david


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.