Plain Text. I loathe HTML email (and RTF I guess though I don't really
notice it). HTML has no place in email IMHO.
If I want to send a formatted document I do it in Word or whatever and send
the document or a PDF.
I also hate that Outlook constantly wants to help me insert bulleted and
numbered lists even though I've told it not to. I mention this simply
because I don't understand why it wants to help me with these features in a
plain text email <shrug> I feel better now I've mentioned it...
Regards
Evan Harris
-----Original Message-----
From: pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pctech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Burns, Bryan
Sent: Wednesday, 17 December 2008 3:11 a.m.
To: PcTech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCTECH] Message formats for Microsoft Outlook Poll
Poll: If you're an Outlook user, do use send messages in HTML, Rich Text or
Plain text? What do you perceive the advantages of the format you're using?
Myself, I go back and forth between HTML and RTF. With HTML, I can select
files which have the same file name and dump them somewhere and it will
append to the file name where as RTF won't. On the other hand, I think RTF
looks better.
Bryan Burns
iSeries Specialist
ECHO, Incorporated
Lake Zurich, Illinois
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.