Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability -- PCTECH

Subject: Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability
From: Lukas Beeler <lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:03:03 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: PC Technical Discussion for iSeries Users <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 15:58, John Jones <chianime@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm curious, though, if the .NET installer terms of service/EULA mentions
that 3rd party application will be modified as a result of the
installation. ÂIf not, i.e. if the user has not somehow (even in ignorance)
consented to the installation of a Firefox addon, the installer should be
considered malware.

Do you consider Skype malware?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability , Douglas Handy
Re: Microsoft may be Firefox's worst vulnerability , John Jones

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.