Chuck Lewis wrote:
How was the conclusion that it would save that kind of money reached ?
Not picking nits here; interested so I can do the math for us.

Don't really know - the estimated savings was sent out in an email. If
I had to do the math, I'd look at the power label on the PSU. Then
figure out how many hours the things are on but not used. If they're
used 9 hours a work day, they're idle 15 hours a day. Times 5 days is
75 hours. 2 full weekend days is 48 hours, making 123 hours of idle
time a week. Times 50 weeks (vacation) 6150 idle hours a year.
Multiply that by your current cost per kWh and again by the number of
machines and you'll probably be close. There are other power savings to
be had as well, including turning printers, scanners and other attached
devices off when not in use. An idling laser printer might be using
more electricity that you like.

In fact, now that I think of it, the total savings could be from the
whole 'please think green' campaign although the offices are already
rigged with lights on a motion sensor so they go off on their own...
--buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.