Re: Inhouse DNS (was Change DNS servers on IBM i) -- PCTECH

Subject: Re: Inhouse DNS (was Change DNS servers on IBM i)
From: David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:20:57 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/pctech/>
List-help: <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "PC Technical Discussion for IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\) Users" <pctech.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:pctech@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/pctech>, <mailto:pctech-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 8/30/2017 3:06 PM, Jeff Crosby wrote:

I don't see why anyone would use in house DNS (except for possible
Intranet things). Just one less thing to worry about.

A caching name server can speed up response.

Plus it makes for easier administration. If the upstream DNS changes, you don't have to force a change out to local devices and wait for it to propagate.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Inhouse DNS (was Change DNS servers on IBM i) , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.