|
>I'd really like to see the ability to step OVER a line of code instead of >stepping into it. >"I know that subroutine works fine, I don't need to see it execute again". We know that any suggestions, complaints, etc about RPG posted on this list will be noticed by Hans and relayed to the team in Toronto. There are also some Rochester IBMers that see this list, but I don't know which department(s) they are in. Does anyone know if people responsible for areas like the debugger see this list? It seems as though COMMON requirements are not very effective anymore. What is the best way to get ideas like Davids' to the right people. It's great that the compiler group publishes a list of projects and allows us to vote on them. It's too bad that other groups in IBM don't do the same thing. Joe Teff * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List! To submit a new * * message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com". To unsubscribe * * from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify * * 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message. Questions should * * be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.