• Subject: Re: Scope of variables and subprocedures.
  • From: Jim Langston <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 14:18:17 -0800
  • Organization: Conex Global Logistics Services, Inc.

I don't think it's possible.  I've only been coding subroutines which,
as you know, don't use the p-spec.

I have so much old...junk...that I have to maintain (we're talking s36
code here) that new stuff comes along without me noticing half the
time, since I'm still S36 code to make it work.

Regards,

Jim Langston

John Taylor wrote:

> Jim,
>
> How have you managed to code procedures without using the P-spec? Please
> note that the question is genuine - no sarcasm intended. Is there a way to
> do this?
>
> John Taylor
> Canada

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.