Re: Setll vs. chain

[David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 05:36 PM 02/09/2000 , Carl Pitcher wrote:
>Am I wrong in assuming that SETLL will just look at the "index" which 
>should be in memory as opposed to CHAIN which most often requires an 
>access to disk to retrieve the record? TIA.

I belive you are correct.

david

--
| Internet: david@midrange.com
| WWW:      http://www.midrange.com/david
|
| This message was written and delivered using 100%
| post-consumer (recycled) data bits.

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---