|
Seems open to interpretation, but my definition of any %int function
would be "the integer portion of". By this definition, -8 is correct.
"The next smallest integer" seems a tad arbitrary to me.
--
Paul Cunnane
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: int(-8.9)=-9 or -8
Author: "Laskosky; Matt" <MLaskosk@kmart.com> at InterNet
Date: 2000-03-02 6:36 am
And Perl returns -8, and according to my instructor this is correct since
the function of %int(-8.9) is to return the integer value of the number w/o
first rounding the number.
Who's right?
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.