|
We have something similar but could not get the eof delay to work correctly. We have several files being triggered and the trigger buffer being dumped to a single PF. When we try to use the EOF Delay with Re-Use Delete and Keyed access, well it does not work. Can you give me some sample code for the EOF Delay program with any tips of how you got it to work? Thanks in advance, Christopher K. Bipes mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com Sr. Programmer/Analyst mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com CrossCheck, Inc. http://www.cross-check.com 6119 State Farm Drive Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102 Rohnert Park CA 94928 Fax: 707 586-1884 If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here. Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000 -----Original Message----- From: Rich Duzenbury [mailto:rduz@westernmidrange.com] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 10:07 AM To: RPG400-L@midrange.com Subject: RE: Changing triggers One of the software vendors I work with has done this. What they did was to build a generic trigger program, which they reference on the ADDPFTRG command. The generic trigger when activiated writes it's data to file. A batch job waiting on the same file with an end of file delay then refers to a table to determine which program(s) should be called to re-signal the trigger. Of course, the generic trigger program has to be well thought out, and including extra program calls to re-signal the trigger does have a performance penalty. AFAIK, these triggers are only *AFTER style triggers, just intended to let another application or interface know that a record had been added/changed/deleted. This setup was written in RPG III Regards, Rich -----Original Message----- From: owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Nelson, Jim (RCIS) Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 9:20 AM To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com' Subject: Changing triggers In our development environment, we are changing SOME trigger on SOME file almost daily. To make such a change, the file that trigger is based on must not have any locks. This has become unworkable with the number of developers and functional test people involved. We are talking about creating completely generic triggers to call a stored procedure which will either run the activity intended or call one or more other stored procedures. When a change was needed it would be made to that front-end stored procedure. +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.