| 
 | 
Java & Rexx fans,
In testing it appears that both run at a similar speed and with the same 
precision.  I know 
how to do I/O in Java so at this point Java gets the nod.  Also Java does not 
have a 
problem with recurssion where rexx is limited to 100 levels, which makes for an 
uglier 
solution.  Also, I am not sure how to dynamically set the scale in Rexx.
Here is the Java solution:
public static BigDecimal factorial(int n) {
        if (n == 1)
        {
                return new BigDecimal(1);
        }
        else
        {
                BigDecimal bd1 = new BigDecimal(n);
                BigDecimal bd2 = bd1.multiply(factorial(n - 1));
                
                return bd2;
        }
}
The Rexx looks like:
numeric digits 1500
arg x
y = 1
do i = x to 1 by -1
  y = i * y
end
say y
exit
Thanks for your help and suggestions.
David Morris
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.