|
I generally pick a 5-char name for each module in a service program that ends with "R4" to designate that I wrote it in RPG IV. Then I start each procedure with the first 3 chars of that module name (everything but the R4). This way, when I see a procedure being called, I know where to look for the source code for that procedure. Example... I have a library of routines for Finished Goods Inventory in a module called FGIR4. The procedures are called things like "fgi_open" "fgi_remove" "fgi_slot" "fgi_close", etc. The "prototype member" which I often use for other things such as named constants relating to the procedures in the service program, I end with a "_H" to signify that its a header member. (i.e. FGI_H) This is mainly because I'm used to ".h" files in C -- at any rate, it seems as good as any other method. Generally I'd also name the actual service program "FGIR4", as well. I have not yet needed to bind more than module into a single service program... If I had many related service programs or modules, I could always put them in a binding directory. Instead of the 'F', 'N', 'C' values that you suggest, I prefer to have something like netf_open, netf_read, and netf_close procedures. I find that more intuitive, somehow. Thats my 2 cents... On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Jim Langston wrote: > I'm starting to build module source files, which I compile then > create a service program with. Each module source file will have > a prototype file. > > What type of a naming scheme should I have? > > I have some functions that would serve one application called Cartage, > so I'm thinking along the lines of CARTAGEMOD and CARTAGEPR for those. > Or should I go with MODCARTAGE and PRCARTAGE ? > > And then I have some general utilities, such as my StampToHHMM and > StampToCYMD routines, which take date/time stamps as input and return > hours and minutes, or CCCCYYMMDD. Should I make a separate module for > these and call it, what, MODDATTIM or DATTIMMOD ? > > Then I have one called RtvNetF which will Retrieve a user's list of > waiting network files one at a time ('F' for first call, 'N' for next > call, 'C' to close and set on LR). What would I call this one? MODSYSTEM > or SYSTEMMOD ? > > And then I want to stick this whole thing in one service program, which > I would call, what, ICSSERVICE ? > > What naming schemes has everyone else settled on? So far there are no > modules on the system at all, nor are there any service programs, so whatever > naming schemes I start with we will most likely go with. > > Any suggestions appreciated. > > Regards, > > Jim Langston +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.