Re: H ActGrp('QILE') vs H ActGrp(*caller) -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: H ActGrp('QILE') vs H ActGrp(*caller)
From: Gary Guthrie <garyguthrie@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 13:23:52 -0500
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Folks,

Trying to determine a rule for which activation group to assign for
service programs, programs, etc. is the wrong approach.

You must step inside the application to know what is sensible in terms
of activation group. In other words, it is an application design
decision. The application environment should determine how you assign
activation groups.

Gary Guthrie
Senior Technical Editor, NEWS/400

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.