RE: Cycle Processing vs. Doing it my way -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: Cycle Processing vs. Doing it my way
From: Mike.Collins@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 17:59:28 +0000
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l>,<mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Sorry for confusion, I managed to miss out the word NOT in my last but one
sentence:

I completely agree with the opinion that the objective of writing a program
is NOT to condense everything into the
least number of lines, as per the indicator example.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.